| 1 | ‘You don’t have to argue you know he’s real’? |
T/F |
| 2 | We must take seriously the sense of knowledge which arises from inner conviction? |
T/F |
| 3 | Intuitive knowing needs no further argument? |
T/F |
| 4 | A feeling of conviction gives us the right to say we know? |
T/F |
| 5 | Religious knowledge arises not from reasoning but from intuition? |
T/F |
| 6 | Intuitive awareness in [ordinary] areas of knowledge is beyond dispute? |
T/F |
| 7 | Cases of genuine religious experiences [do not need] reasoning to justify [them]? |
T/F |
| 8 | First and foremost it is by intuition through religious experience that God is known? |
T/F |
| 9 | It is a fatal weakness [this] reliance on intuition as a way of knowledge? |
T/F |
| 10 | One can feel certain without being right? |
T/F |
| 11 | The feel of certainty is not what makes us right? |
T/F |
| 12 | The intuitive feeling of certainty [can] let you down? |
T/F |
| 13 | The reliability of our sense of intuition is not something to be taken for granted? |
T/F |
| 14 | Deception is constantly practised with success? |
T/F |
| 15 | The more groping methods of the intellect are in the long run more reliable? |
T/F |
| 16 | Certainty of religious experience takes it for granted that there is a genuine object of experience? |
T/F |
| 17 | Questions of reasoning or analysis have no application to the profound experiences of meeting and encounter [of God]? |
T/F |
| 18 | That someone who has experienced something for themselves is in a better position to know the truth about it than someone who has not? |
T/F |
| 19 | Knowledge is not merely a matter of experiences [but]what one can do with or make of them? |
T/F |
| 20 | Where popular religious reasoning falls down is in trying to treat [the sense of knowing God] as a form of knowledge of a self-certifying kind. |
T/F |