Notes from the A2 conference – The ontological argument

This argument is based on a definition of God.

If we can agree on a definition we should be able to agree on a conclusion.


No based on evidence and therefore more rational.

If the premises are sound we must accept the conclusion

De dicto – by definition

In intellectu – in the mind

Critics say existence doesn’t add anything to our understanding of God however Anselm says yes it does – to know of his existence is not the same as knowing him and one cannot know him if he does not exist.

Gaunilo‘s island – if the island is perfect it must exist because existence is a ‘perfection’ BUT it doesn’t!

Anselm said contingent things can always be added to there fore can never be perfect; only a non-contingent being cannot be added to therefore the onto argument only applies to necessary beings.

Gasking: the creation of the universe is the greatest achievement

  • The greater the achievement the more impressive if the creator is limited
  • The greatest limit would be non=existence
  • Therefore the creation of the universe by a non-existing creator is greater than by an existing one
  • Therefore God does not exist!!
  • Reduction ad absurdam!!


  • God can either exist or not
  • If he doesn’t then not most perfect conceivable being
  • If he does exist he cannot exist contingently
  • Therefore he must exist necessarily.

Plantinga‘s multiverse theory depends on ‘if…’

Hume – anything we can conceive of as existing we can also conceive of as not existing

He didn’t believe there was anything which was not contingent therefore God does not exist.


Did you find this information helpful?