Hollywood Stars

  • Exist not just in the films but in photos, public appearances, magazines.
  • From WWII on – Audiences keen to consume details of stars’ lives.
  • Hollywood seen as glamorous to British viewers
  • American stars epitomised ideology of consumerism.
  • Audiences did not want the ordinary but the unattainable.
  • Stars presented more mature, complete, confident self-images. Articulated through glamorous dress, hair, makeup and general physical appearance. Offered utopian fantasies and transcendence i.e. losing oneself, opportunity to escape for a while.

Identification:

How is the spectator linked to the character?

  • Use of camera and editing to build an ‘I’ picture.
  • The way the character leads us through the story, encouraging sympathy and sharing of knowledge.
  • Important for gendered identities, in that media texts construct images of idealised self.
  • Use of mirrors in films to provide idealised or distorted or potential for destruction of images (The Phantom of the Opera / Talented Mr Ripley)

Cinematic identification fantasies

  • Devotion – viewers may say they have seen every film a star has made or a film e.g. Titanic, umpteen times
  • Adoration – fantasised romance.
  • Worship – goddesses!

Homoerotic bonds

  • Transcendence – escapism
  • Aspiration – fan wants to be like star.
  • Inspiration – stars offer audiences more powerful and confident images of self, we would like to have their confidence, strength, independence.

Extra-cinematic identification processes

  • Pretending – Dressing like them, role playing
  • Imitation – adopting gestures, speech patterns.
  • Resembling – selecting an element of physical appearance one has which is like the star’s e.g. eyes, legs…
  • Copying – hair or clothing – magazines often offer this possibility – remember Jennifer Anniston’s hair style?

Points worth noting:

  • Consumption is female by tradition!
  • Shopping encourages connection between desiring and having.
  • Cinema screens are shop windows – offer us endless opportunities to have the look , the life style, the gadgets etc. and merchandising extends this.
  • Product placement – Aston Martins, Minis, etc. all advertised within and in promotional material for the films.
  • Woman is a commodity too! Idealisation of femininity: thin, long legged, active, sexual being…

Supplementary articles on TV News

Herman and Chomsky’s Propaganda Model of News
Five filters which ensure only certain kinds of information filter through; filters which ensure privileged info which suits the interests of powerful elites. These filters are:

  1. ownership: a few large and wealthy organisations – news is more apt to be pro their owner’s interests.
  2. advertising: affluent audiences needed; advertisers need a buying mood – lighter stories
  3. sourcing: tight timetables lead to journalists accepting pre-packaged information therefore well-resourced organisations can gear up to supply these ‘packages’ and they can reflect their interests.
  4. flak: certain stories can generate expensive legal battles e.g. evidence against the tobacco industry.
  5. ideological: unquestioned assumptions about the superiority of capitalism over communism; currently US v Iraq.

 

Van Zoonen 1994
“In feminist research the conclusion is that media output fails to represent the actual numbers of women in the world (51%) and their contribution to the labour force.”

 

From John Hartley
How to analyse a news programme:

News as an industrial commodity

Journalism: news values
Competition: news as a commercial commodity; sources; rival news media
Entertainment – how to retain viewers while telling them unpalatable truths; how does news appeal and appal?
Regulation: licensing; ‘decency’; self-censorship; violence (but not between intimates); dead bodies but not in close-up (broken during most recent gulf war!)

 

News as a generic form

Visual elements; décor, set, graphics
Verbal / sound effects; institutional voices (reporters/ commentators / anchors) accessed voices (‘real’ people);effects (music/ dubbed sounds)
Narration: plot of stories; characters(we/they) (personifications: heroes/ villains / victims); action and dialogue within and between stories.
Differentiation: how news is like and unlike other genres (advertising /talk shows /drama) and media (papers / radio / internet.)

 

News as dramatisation of democracy

Our representatives – talking heads (decision making); Visualised by location (reporters outside no. 10); celebs (actions and remarks) based on bodily recognition.
Vox pops: ‘ordinary’ people’s views, soundbites of the ‘chorus’ of politics.
National identity: myths of who we are, ‘we love children’, ‘we are free’, ‘ …they are illegal immigrants’…

 

News as a regime of truth

Impartiality versus bias
Conflict: truth as a ‘product’ of both sides; truth as violence!
Eyewitness ideology: ‘being there’ is trustworthy; but the info comes form a handout and a reporter stands in front of the relevant scene.
Fact versus fiction: news has eye contact but no music, drama has music but no eye contact!